Rape is NOT Funny....

While watching Robot Chicken's Season 2 DVD, I came across this...um... piece of 'coal' in a mist of diamonds. This disapoints me in a way I cannot describe. I generally love Robot Chicken and find the show hilarious... I absolutely love and crave the crazy low-fi stop motion aesthetic. It's hard to make slap-stick comic timing in stop motion animation and do it well. They do that.

But... back to what I was posting, RAPE IS NOT FUNNY! When I watch my Robot Chicken DVD, I need to fast forward this every time: It's a short skit and parody on Snuggles commercials. The bear does his cute and cuddly thing and a man, who was doing his laundry, starts touching him. He's says things like "Ooooh, you're soft." and starts rubbing the bear more... the more aroused the man gets the more terrified and uncomfortable the bear gets. Eventually the man takes Snuggles into the bathroom and you can hear everything... which is insanely disturbing. You hear the guy raping the bear, and the bear obviously not liking it, saying things like "This is a no-no!" while the guy responds with "Don't fight it." while raping him. Then the man stuffs Snuggles in the washer then dryer and is ready to go again. Snuggles is twitching and is distressed by what happened. The man starts taking him back to the bathroom, while Snuggles says 'No! No!" And then the guy takes him back in the bathroom while the Snuggles/Cuddles bear is constantly saying "No! This isn't right." Then a man's voice comes up and the word 'Cuddles' appears on the screen like a commercial saying: "Cuddles brand fabric softner...when your clothes have to be huggably, rapeably, fresh."

I realize that this is a parody of Snuggles fabric sofner and understand why the majority of Robot Chicken's target audience would find it funny. It exhibits the natural animated violence coupled with humor tactic by removing the human quality of the even itself to make it funny. The only reason why it is 'supposed' to be funny is because the object being raped is a talking stuffed bear. After the bear is raped, it's supposed to be funny that it exhibits obvious trauma over the aid experience and then it's raped again. How could anyone possibly think that's funny? All it's doing is removing the true trauma of rape and victims of rape to make a joke. NOT FUNNY!

Ode To Hayao Miyazaki!

Arguably, some of the best and most stunning animation ever made has been created through Studio Ghibli... other than the stunning brilliance of the animation, I would like to note key points in a few of his movies that make them something to be honored on this blog. Generally speaking, the movies Miyazaki creates have strong, independent, compassionate, and understanding male and female characters. There are no differences in gender hierarchy. Both genders help fuel the story in positive ways and impact each other's lives harmoniously for the better.

"My Neighbor Totoro" (1988): A positive father-friendly image of a family. From my understanding, it is generally the mother that has to struggle with raising children in most movies and plot lines. Here, the father takes care of his two daughters while awaiting his wife (who is suffering from a disease) to return from the hospital. He is the epitome of a great father, a very patient and understanding man who loves his children.

"Princess Mononoke" (1997): The story centers on two people equally: a very kind-hearted, logical boy: Ashitaka, who provides balance to a chaotic world by seeing 'through eyes unclouded by hate', and San: a girl raised by wolves and defends the forest. Both of them are strong independent people, who need each other to help unify the two feuding places of the forest and Iron Town. In the end, forest/wolf-raised San and village/human raised Ashitaka recognize their differences and their love for each other. Instead of one leaving the world in which they are comfortable in (forest/village), they choose to exist separately, San in the forest, and Ashitaka in Iron Town. They declare to meet each other when they have spare time. If only Disney's "The Little Mermaid" could have turned out that way... without all the unnecessary sacrifices... ;)

There are others that are equally as wonderful (Spirited Away, Laputa: Castle in the Sky, Howl's Moving Castle, Kiki's Delivery Service, etc.) but the two above are the most mentionable. However, in all of Hayao Miyazaki's movies, both the female and male character help each other grow and change positively. They are definitely worth checking out!

Trailer Release of 'The Princess and the Frog'

Here is a link to 'The Princess and the Frog' trailer:

http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/princessandthefrog/


I'm counting down the days and interested in seeing how everything will be put together. So far I think that the character design is beautiful, and, although the whole Disney Princess craze can have a rather negative impact on girls, I am happy to think that darker skinned girls could jump right in instead of continuing to be left out of the Disney Princess fun...

One concern, however, is the lightning bug's voice paired with his speech... I'm still fighting with my thoughts on that one.

Brief History and Analysis of Other Ethnic Disney Princesses

There are three current non-white Disney Princesses…

The first non-white animated Disney princess was Jasmine from Aladdin in 1992. In the opening song Arabian Nights, Robin Williams (in a thick Arabic accent) sings a song about the movie’s specific and Arabic lifestyle. He originally sang: ‘Where they cut off your ear if they don’t like your face/it’s barbaric, but hey, it’s home.” to ‘Where it’s flat and immense and the heat is intense/it’s barbaric, but hey, it’s home’. (The version I own actually says the second phrasing). Entertainment Weekly ranked Aladdin as being one of the most controversial films in history because of those lyrics. Another complaint/issue was that the likeable Arabic characters where light skinned and had more Caucasian features, while the unlikable/villain characters had Arabic accents and darker skin.

The second diverse Disney princess was Pocahontas, from the movie with the same name that came out in 1995. The film’s premiere still holds the record of the largest movie premiere ever. It was criticized for the inaccuracy of different ethnic groups in the film and for historical inaccuracies too. Many people thought that the character design of Pocahontas did not make her look Native American but made her look ‘fashionably exotic’. The film also distorts the true and noble history behind Pocahontas. She revered John Smith as a father, being only 10-12 years old when meeting him, her marriage to Kocoum and John Rolfe later, her kidnapping by the English, and conversion to Christianity. Pocahontas’ romantic relationship with John Smith was written into the script to keep with Disney’s theme of the lead characters ending up together (although movies like The Black Cauldron, Fantasia, Alice, and the Sword and the Stone didn’t need romantic energy to make the plotlines interesting)…

The last diverse Disney princess to be animated was Mulan in 1998. This animated film had many feminist critiques about the film making fun of repressive gender roles. Mulan’s only perceivable goal as a female is to be a good daughter to her father and then be a good wife to her husband. There are many instances where a woman’s place is nailed down. However, Mulan defies all of those in the end to find her ‘happily ever after’ happiness. But, she had to dress like a man to get it. What exactly does that say? Kudos to this though: Mulan’s character is, so far, the strongest and most independent of all the Disney princesses without being overly glamorous and stereotypically beautiful.

Out of the three princesses mentioned above, only Jasmine and Mulan seem have ‘Disney Princess’ marketing. Pocahontas is largely left out. (Even Jasmine and Mulan are left out in a lot of the merchandise as well… one great example is the Disney Princess cereal… only white princesses I guess.) Also, the dress-up clothes for Mulan are the clothes she is uncomfortable in, since she doesn’t know her true identity. She was herself when in her armor. Now, I know that in today’s society it’s very hard to market things that can be as gender-ambiguous/ redefining as giving a little girl armor to wear. Little girls are told that they should wear dresses and want to be glamorous. They market Mulan’s feminine attire, but perhaps they should sell sets of the armor and Mulan’s dress, so that girls can play the two different personas of Mulan’s character identity in the film.

Disney’s Racial Diversity: “The Princess and the Frog”

‘The Princess and the Frog’, a Disney animated feature production, will come to theaters in May 2009 and will also be the first Disney animated film to feature an ‘African American’ princess. Also, it will be the first hand-drawn animation Disney has made since Home on the Range in 2004. Originally, it was said that Home on the Range would be the last 2-D traditionally animated Disney film to be made. As of February 2007, Disney changed their mind and committed to making ‘The Princess and the Frog’.

‘The Princess in and the Frog’ takes place in America during the early 1900’s in the French Quarter of New Orleans. The main character’s name was Maddy but was changed to Tiana after her name received controversy since it was thought to be a stereotypically lower-class black name. She was originally as a chambermaid as well. I am interested to see what Disney’s portrayal of the New Orleans culture in the 1920s-1930s is, and how it affected black Americans at that time. I know that Disney is walking a fine line at the moment and I anticipate the final results. They had better be good!

Lillian Friedman - Rejected from Disney

Apparently, Lillian Friedman had applied to Disney and was rejected based on the fact that she was female. There has always (and maybe will always be) a very conservative and rigid undertone in anything and everything produced by Disney in terms of sociological American norms of the time period. Not so with Fleischer Studios. Many of the Fleischer animations are spur of the moment concepts, and are not rigidly based. The animators had more liberal freedom in terms of applying their own humor and animated concepts to any given story. I think that the given differences and comparisons between the two studios can justly and accurately explain why, in the 1930's, Friedman would have been a hired animator at Fleischer Studios and not at Disney.

via: feministing.com

Lillian Friedman - First Female American Animator!

Lillian Friedman became the first woman animator 1933, working for the Fleischer Studios. Some of the short animations she worked on include: Buzzy Boop at the Concert (1938), Pudgy and the Lost Kitten (1938), Honest Love and True (1938), The New Deal Show (1937), Pudgy Takes a Bow-Wow (1937), Be Human (1936), Hawaiian Birds (1936), Making Stars (1935), Judge for a Day (1935), and Betty Boop's Prize Show (1934). Hawaiian Birds (who's screenshot photo featured to the right), is in my top ten favorite short animations. I grew up watching Fleischer Bros. animation as well as Looney Tunes, Disney Shorts, etc. and Hawaiian Birds stands out as being one of my favorites for many reasons! Definitely something to check out on Youtube.com.